In which we explore and get bewildered and then find ourselves again
We wanted to see where the new Whitehorse Trail hooks into the
Bracken/Armstrong tract of the Pilchuck Tree Farm.
![]() |
| Usual Suspects and Motley Mongrels : Santa Jim, me, Patty, and Sirie accompanied by puppy Ferret/Carrot/Barrett, Roo, Connor, and Marco photo by S. Neal |
On New Year's Day, Jim and I explored about 2.5 miles of the Whitehorse Trail from the trailhead near our house, and during those explorations we found a place that looked really familiar....but where exactly, did that spot occur on the riding trails at Bracken?
Today, we headed out with friends and dogs to find out.
| Santa Jim consulted the map we made from our walk on New Years, overlaid it onto the topo map, and threw it onto his phone for our day of exploration. |
The intersection point is just beyond the bridge, at milepost 10.5(ish)
| Patty and Connor |
Head north at the road intersection.
| A nice view of the river |
Important Plot Point: go right at the SPEED LIMIT sign.
Here's the map of our track, including the wrong turn we accidentally took onto private property.
![]() |
| red x's are private. light blue is muddy. dark blue is good trail. |
The property owner gave us directions, and within a few minutes we were where we wanted to be!
| Unnamed puddle |
| This trail isn't used much, but Jim and I remembered it from years ago. |
The old trail has been logged recently. The problem with logging the woods in winter is the astonishing amount of mud created by the log trucks.
| Half-frozen mud. Passable, but not ideal. |
| Even with a gravel-armored roadbed, the trucks really rip up the track |
On higher and drier ground, the people walked more easily and the dogs wallowed a bit less.
| The trail was less messed-up here, and all the riders recognized exactly where we were. |
| Santa Jim was in charge of the map track. |
And soon...
| Back on the Whitehorse, headed for the trucks...and for lunch! |
Pretty good, eh?



Comments
Post a Comment
To err is human. To be anonymous is not.